Old Motifator threads are available in the Archive.
damir65
Total Posts: 13
Joined 10-05-2014 status: Regular |
Hello Guys,
is it possible to setup Motif XF to hear Audio trough USB as it is in MOXF? This would be pretty cool feature MOXF manage to have.
|
damir65
Total Posts: 13
Joined 10-05-2014 status: Regular |
Guy’s what do you think about this topic? Shouldn’t Yamaha add that feature in 3 time more expensive keyboard? It is all about driver, nothing else. I hope that they avoiding it because sales of FireWire card? Yamaha, do you have any answer on that?
|
5pinDIN
Total Posts: 11891
Joined 09-16-2010 status: Legend |
Some things to consider:
Background:
I’m sure that Yamaha would like to continue selling FW16E interfaces, but that’s not the entire story. |
damir65
Total Posts: 13
Joined 10-05-2014 status: Regular |
Thanks for your replay 5pinDIN. What I know is that MOXF (as per Yamaha’s advertising) has same heart as XF. This can be seen also on comparative charts.
Image Attachments
|
philwoodmusic
Total Posts: 1055
Joined 07-01-2013 status: Guru |
I’m not really sure how you can claim be fooled when the XF came out before the MOX and MOXF did. The MOX and MOXF are also mid range workstations. The USB audio functionality of the MOX and MOXF is nothing like that of the FW16E. The USB audio functionality on a MOX or a MOXF only gives you 4 out (or two stereo pairs) at 24 bit 44.1 kHz. The FW16E can give you 16 mono channels (or 8 stereo pairs) at 24 bit 96 kHz. The MOX or MOXF is a very basic interface by comparison to the FW16E. You also have SPDIF as standard on your Motif XF, which the MOX and MOXF do not have. Technology will always change and those changes will always upset someone who bought something before those changes. Your only other choice is to never buy anything, but you did buy it and you sound rather happy with it, anyway. |
5pinDIN
Total Posts: 11891
Joined 09-16-2010 status: Legend |
The MOXF and XF share the same basic sound engine. Aside from that, there are numerous differences between the two models.
Â
I don’t know who “you” and “your” refer to. I certainly don’t work for or represent Yamaha, and nobody else who currently posts on Motifator does.
Â
Your timeline doesn’t represent the actual development of the Motif XF. The time between the XF and MOXF releases isn’t the point. Although the MOXF includes certain features from the XF, the MOXF is based on the MOX. The MOX was introduced four years later than the XS. That means the XF is based on a design four years before USB audio was included in the MOX. That’s the situation, for better or worse.
I posted this in an earlier thread:
Motif (Classic) 8/2001 (after Summer NAMM)
MO 11/2005
|
damir65
Total Posts: 13
Joined 10-05-2014 status: Regular |
Thanks guys for your replies.
|
5pinDIN
Total Posts: 11891
Joined 09-16-2010 status: Legend |
No offense taken, and none intended. I understand that having certain features could make life easier, but unfortunately “you can’t always get what you want”. Interfacing a synth to a computer will probably remain a problem to some degree in the foreseeable future. Computer technology is improving at a rapid pace, but synth development tends to lag it a bit. There’s a also a tendency to keep synths for a long time, while frequently updating to the latest computer. That tends to make having the “right” port/bus available somewhat hit-or-miss. |
moxrox
Total Posts: 440
Joined 11-28-2011 status: Enthusiast |
I used to own a MOX (as you might have guessed from my name) and I really liked the audio over USB that the MOX offered. But I decided to go from the middle of the line series (which includes MOX and MOXF) to the top of the line series (XS, XF) because of the additional capabilities it has to offer. Yes, audio over USB is a convenience, and at first I missed it when I went from the MOX to the XF. But as Phil and 5Pin pointed out, the audio over Firewire on the XF offers far greater functionality. However, that functionality comes at a price, both in complexity and in cost. Agreed, it would be nice to have both (I really do miss audio over USB!), but that would just drive the cost up even more. So if each keyboard only has one audio interface, adding the convenient but limited capability of audio over USB to the MOX/MOXF series, and the more flexible audio over Firewire to the XF, makes sense to me. |